A couple of years ago, Publisher’s Weekly decided that for the low, low price of $149, self-publishers could buy the right to MAYBE get reviewed by them.
One blogger, a self-published writer herself, says that she feels PW is so entrenched in the “traditional” publishing model that they are deliberately trashing self-pubbed novels in their reviews. She gives statistics that of 99 novels submitted one quarter, only 25 merited a review and of those 25 only 4 were at all complimentary. In fact, she calls the other 21 reviews “scathing.”
I do not see any proof of her implication that PW is deliberately trashing these books in order to squash traditional publishers competition. I’ve always heard that 99% of queries received by publishers are rejected. By those numbers, giving 4 good reviews out of a total of 99 books sounds like a win.
What do you think? Is big publishing and their cohorts trashing indie books unfairly, or no?
I know there’s a lot of bad writing out there (I’m not defending it!) and that self-publishing was, and a lot of the times still is, a venue for vanity. But it’s becoming more and more mainstream, the way to go, and I find it hard to believe that of the nearly one hundred novels submitted, PW couldn’t have found a few more things to like. You can practically sense the glee emanating from the reviewers as they rip apart these books. …read more
via Publishers Weekly seems to relish scathing reviews of self-published books | A City Mom.